¤ª¤Ï¤Ê¤··Ç¼¨ÈÄ

¥È¥Ã¥×¥Ú¡¼¥¸¤Ø

vltpPhtEAIh

Æü»þ¡§ 2018/10/07 12:05
̾Á°¡§ Sergio
URL¡§ http://www.clk2.co/stmap_e93a0.html?viagra.avandamet.sustiva.almond-cucumber
ID¡§ tcvReDEw

Which university are you at? http://www.drechsel.com/stmap_570e0.html?cialis.viracept.manxxx.mometasone www.traveldoctor.co.uk/malaria.htm It’s certainly a very well-written, well-supported statement from Lionsgate but I suppose the question people will have to ponder now is – did it come too late? Should Lionsgate have come out against the author, whose work they optioned for a film, the moment they optioned it? Considering Hollywood deals, I don’t think that’s a realistic expectation but I do wonder why their public relations team didn’t have someone do an interview at least discussing the topic earlier. Perhaps they thought they would be the impetus for a boycott themselves if they did?

Page:[1]

¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë ¡¡ ¤³¤Î¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥É¤òÀèƬ¤Ë°ÜÆ°
̾Á°
E-Mail
URL
¥Ñ¥¹¥ï¡¼¥É ¡ÊÊÖ¿®ÆâÍƤν¤Àµ¤äºï½ü»þ¤Ë»ÈÍÑ¡Ë
¥³¥á¥ó¥È
²èÁü¥Õ¥¡¥¤¥ë
¡¡    ̾Á°¡¢E-Mail¡¢URL¡¢¥Ñ¥¹¥ï¡¼¥É¤òÊݸ¤¹¤ë